Interface

Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS)

A cognitive and behavioural screen designed specifically for people with ALS.

By Claire White

Psychometrics

Sensitivity for ALS-characteristic impairment85%
Specificity against matched controls85%
Test-retest, alternate forms (total)ICC > 0.90

Sensitivity and specificity from Niven and colleagues (2015), 40 ALS patients against 40 matched controls. Test-retest from Crockford and colleagues (2018), 80 healthy participants across three alternate forms at four-month intervals. Higher is better.

What does the ECAS measure?

The ECAS was designed for ALS specifically, so tasks avoid the motor responses that ALS makes difficult. The ALS-specific section covers verbal fluency, executive function including social cognition, and language. The ALS-nonspecific section covers memory and visuospatial ability, the functions ALS usually spares. A separate carer interview covers behaviour change and psychotic symptoms across five domains associated with frontotemporal dementia.

What does an ECAS score mean?

Three numbers are reported, each higher-is-better. These are the original Edinburgh cut-offs, below which impairment is likely.

ECAS score ranges and the original Edinburgh cut-offs
ScoreRangeImpairment likely
ALS-Specific0 to 100Below 77
ALS Non-specific0 to 36Below 24
ECAS Total0 to 136Below 105

Cut-offs are population-specific. A Chinese validation set the total cut-off at 81.92, and the German, Swiss-German, and Italian versions publish age- and education-adjusted norms. On repeat testing with the alternate forms, a drop of 8 or more on ALS-Specific, 4 or more on ALS Non-specific, or 9 or more on the total counts as reliable change rather than measurement noise. Behavioural change on the carer interview is reported separately and is not added to the total.

The result is reference information that flags the need for a fuller assessment. It is not a diagnosis.

How the ECAS is administered

Administered by
A health care professional, such as a specialist nurse, preferably supervised by a neuropsychologist
Time to administer
15 to 20 minutes
Cost
Free to take here.
Published by
University of Edinburgh
Training required
Certification through the ECAS team at the University of Edinburgh
Repeat testing
Three alternate forms, A, B and C, with no significant practice effect
Available languages
26, including American English, Chinese, Dutch, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, and Welsh

Which conditions is the ECAS used for?

Related instruments

ECAS questions, answered

How is the ECAS scored?

Two scores plus a total. Language, verbal fluency, and executive function make up the ALS-Specific score out of 100. Memory and visuospatial function make up the ALS Non-specific score out of 36. Together they give a total out of 136. A carer interview on behaviour and psychotic symptoms is reported separately and is not added to the total.

What is a normal ECAS score?

Against the original Edinburgh cut-offs, 77 or above on ALS-Specific, 24 or above on ALS Non-specific, and 105 or above on the total. Cut-offs vary by language and population, so a local normative set takes precedence where one exists.

How long does the ECAS take?

15 to 20 minutes. A Chinese validation cohort averaged 18 minutes.

Who can administer the ECAS?

A health care professional, such as a specialist nurse, preferably supervised by a neuropsychologist, after certification through the ECAS team at the University of Edinburgh.

Is the ECAS free?

Yes. It is free to take here. The ECAS itself is published by the University of Edinburgh, which is who to approach about administering it in your own practice.

Can the ECAS be repeated over time?

Yes. Three alternate forms exist for serial testing, with no significant practice effect across three sessions and test-retest intraclass correlations above 0.90. A drop of 9 or more points on the total is a reliable change rather than measurement noise.

How is the ECAS different from a general cognitive screen?

It is built so that hand and speech impairment does not depress the score, and it separates the functions ALS typically affects from those it typically spares. A 2024 systematic review of six ALS screening tools found the cognitive component of the ECAS had the most evidence of reliability and validity.

Evidence, psychometrics and provenance

Created by Sharon Abrahams, Thomas Bak, and colleagues at the University of Edinburgh, and published in 2014. The University of Edinburgh holds the copyright and distributes the forms, guidelines, and translations.

Reliable change on retest
8 points ALS-Specific, 4 Non-specific, 9 total (Crockford, 2018)
Evidence base
Best-evidenced of six ALS cognitive screens in a 2024 systematic review

References

  1. 1.Abrahams S, Newton J, Niven E, Foley J, Bak TH. Screening for cognition and behaviour changes in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(1-2):9-14.
  2. 2.Niven E, Newton J, Foley J, et al. Validation of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS): a cognitive tool for motor disorders. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(3-4):172-179.
  3. 3.Crockford C, Newton J, Lonergan K, et al. Measuring reliable change in cognition using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018;19(1-2):65-73.
  4. 4.Ye S, Ji Y, Li C, He J, Liu X, Fan D. The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen in a Chinese amyotrophic lateral sclerosis population. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155496.
  5. 5.Didcote L, Vitoratou S, Al-Chalabi A, Goldstein LH. What is the extent of reliability and validity evidence for screening tools for cognitive and behavioral change in people with ALS? A systematic review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2024;25(5-6):437-451.
  6. 6.Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen. University of Edinburgh, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Forms, guidelines, international versions, and training.

This assessment uses a validated instrument and is reference information, not a diagnosis.