Interface

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

A 7-point global disability scale measuring functional independence after stroke.

By Claire White

Psychometrics

Inter-rater agreement, conventional gradingkappa 0.56
Inter-rater agreement, structured interviewkappa 0.74

Unweighted kappa between raters. Conventional grading is from van Swieten et al. (1988), 100 stroke patients rated in pairs by 34 neurologists and residents. Structured interview is from Wilson et al. (2005), 113 patients and 15 raters. Higher is better.

What does the mRS measure?

The mRS reduces global disability and dependence to a single grade. It asks how much help a person needs with their usual activities, whether they can walk, and whether they can attend to their own bodily needs. It does not break function into separate domains the way an activities of daily living scale does, which is what makes it quick and what makes the wording of the question matter so much.

That is why structured formats exist. Wilson and colleagues defined a set of questions covering constant care, basic and instrumental daily activities, participation in usual social roles, and a checklist of common stroke symptoms. The Rankin Focused Assessment and the nine-question mRS-9Q are shorter versions of the same idea. Each raises agreement between raters over free grading.

What does an mRS grade mean?

The grades below are the definitions published by van Swieten and colleagues in 1988.

Grade definitions for the modified Rankin Scale
GradeDefinition
0No symptoms
1No significant disability despite symptoms. Able to carry out all usual duties and activities.
2Slight disability. Unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance.
3Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk without assistance.
4Moderately severe disability. Unable to walk without assistance, and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance.
5Severe disability. Bedridden, incontinent, and requiring constant nursing care and attention.
6Death.

The 1988 scale ran from 0 to 5. Grade 6, recording death, was added later as the mRS became the standard endpoint in stroke trials, which is why some reference sources still describe six grades and others seven.

Trials most often report a grade of 0 to 2 as a favourable outcome, the range in which a person remains independent in daily life. Repeated over months and years, the grade tracks the course of recovery. It is reference information for the care team.

How the mRS is administered

Administered by
A clinician or trained interviewer. The mRS-9Q can be completed by non-medical study personnel.
Time to administer
5 to 15 minutes. The Rankin Focused Assessment takes 3 to 5 minutes.
Equipment
Paper and pencil. No specialised equipment.
Cost
Free to take here.
Training required
None formally. A structured interview raises agreement between raters and is the usual practice in trials.
Remote administration
The mRS-9Q returns the same grade by telephone as on paper (weighted kappa 0.95)
Age range
Adults
Available languages
German, Persian, and Dutch translations are documented

Which conditions is the mRS used for?

Related instruments

mRS questions, answered

What does each mRS grade mean?

0 is no symptoms. 1 is symptoms without significant disability, with all usual activities intact. 2 is slight disability, no longer able to do everything as before but independent in daily affairs. 3 is moderate disability, needing some help but walking without assistance. 4 is moderately severe disability, unable to walk or attend to bodily needs without assistance. 5 is severe disability, bedridden and needing constant care. 6 records death. The grade is reference information for the care team.

What is the mRS-9Q?

A set of nine yes-or-no questions that determines the mRS grade in a simple, reliable way, without needing a trained interviewer to grade freely. The assessment here follows this structured question format.

What counts as a good outcome on the mRS?

Stroke trials most often define a good outcome as a grade of 0 to 2, the range where a person remains independent in daily life.

Who assigns the grade?

A clinician. Agreement between raters is moderate when the grade is assigned freely and substantially better when it comes from a structured interview.

How long does the mRS take?

5 to 15 minutes. The Rankin Focused Assessment, a short structured version written for trials, takes 3 to 5 minutes and reached a weighted kappa of 0.99 between observers in its validation study.

Evidence, psychometrics and provenance

Rankin published the original scale in 1957 for patients over 60 who had had a cerebrovascular accident. Van Swieten and colleagues modified it in 1988, adding a grade for no symptoms and reporting the first agreement analysis. The structured formats that most trials now use came later, from Wilson and colleagues in 2005, Saver and colleagues in 2010, and Patel and colleagues in 2012.

Inter-rater agreement across many raters
kappa 0.25 for conventional grading across 15 raters and 113 patients (Wilson et al., 2005)
Intra-rater reliability
kappa 0.81 on repeat assessment (Wilson et al., 2005)
Test-retest reliability
kappa 0.81 to 0.95 across the literature (Banks and Marotta, 2007)
Rankin Focused Assessment
Weighted kappa 0.99 across 50 patients at 90 days (Saver et al., 2010)
mRS-9Q
kappa 0.80 against a structured interview (Patel et al., 2012)

References

  1. 1.Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200-215.
  2. 2.van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5):604-607.
  3. 3.Wilson JTL, Hareendran A, Hendry A, Potter J, Bone I, Muir KW. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke. 2005;36(4):777-781.
  4. 4.Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091-1096.
  5. 5.Saver JL, Filip B, Hamilton S, et al. Improving the reliability of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice: the Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA). Stroke. 2010;41(5):992-995.
  6. 6.Patel N, Rao VA, Heilman-Espinoza ER, Lai R, Quesada RA, Flint AC. Simple and reliable determination of the modified Rankin Scale score in neurosurgical and neurological patients: the mRS-9Q. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(5):971-975.
  7. 7.Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Rehabilitation Measures Database: Modified Rankin Handicap Scale.

This assessment uses a validated instrument and is reference information, not a diagnosis.